MindShift Integral

TRANSFORMATION – INSIGHT – LEADERSHIP

cat


1 Comment

Integral Leadership: Feeling into the Moment

How does it fit together: intuition, integrity, leadership, (construct) awareness, subtle states? Here is the attempt of an architecture. Presentation at the Integral Theory Conference, San Francisco,  July 18 -21, 2013 

integral leadership caspari

Academic Paper download here: Reams & Caspari_ITC2013

Powerpoint: ITC California 2013 Reams Caspari

U process Caspari


2 Comments

Shifting Personal Reality

Shifting Personal Reality

The ability to shift personal reality in one’s self and the competency to assist others with their transformation is one of the basic skills for integral mentoring of any kind. This can apply to individual work with leaders, ‘trim tabs’ and change agents, or to collective work with stakeholder groups, organizations  or NGOs. The kind of assistance needed depends on many different factors, such as the unique action logic or kosmic address of everybody involved  (see previous post) and, of course, on the nature of the task ahead.

Yet despite the abundant variables, transformational change follows a very recognizable blueprint that, much like a wave, keeps its pattern integrity. We encounter this archetypal pattern everywhere, a cultural software of the human species. Its epic version is masterfully described in Joseph Campbell’s Hero’s Journey.

The more post-modern version is Scharmer’s U Process for collective transformation and prototyping. The smaller day to day or moment to moment encounter with transformation, like changing a destructive habit, overcoming fear or shadow work either go unobserved or are subject to a myriad of self-help books.

Whatever the scale is, the archetypal movement remains that of a dive into interiority, the ‘small death (or micro-dis-identification) and the resurfacing with a different perspective. This process can take minutes, days, months, or a lifetime, and is iterative. A typical transformational process needs basic prerequisites in order to succeed. External factors include a safe space, a method/injunction to follow, a coach or mentor, or rules.

Interior conditions (interior to the person) include a willingness to re-own previously resisted or dis-associated shadow parts. It may also require the capacity to access, if just for a very short period of time, different states of consciousness. Scharmer (2009) describes the respective stations “open mind”, “open heart” and “open will”, indicating the willingness to suspend judgement, becoming vulnerable and authentic, and most of all, present. He describes this movement down the U as going from gross to subtle, and the combination of sensing and being present -“precensing”- at the bottom at the U as causal. 

In reality, the access to these different states of consciousness is not that clear cut and often fuzzy.

The process of accessing subtle or even causal states can follow various patterns, primarily cycling between the work of shadow parts and resistances being integrated and sensations of relief along the descending arm of the U. The quality of that access and subsequently of the depth, width and nature of transformation depends on many factors, such as the altitude, meaning making system and personal integrity of the person(s) undergoing the process and on the effectiveness of the tools and methods applied.

The following diagram uses the U shape to map out some of the typical stages of a transformative process, along with the internal and external conditions that would foster a deep and successful shift in personal reality, individual or collective. In the next paper, the lateral movements and escape mechanisms that occur along the different stations will be discussed, along with the tools that could successfully counterbalance them.

“We’ve come to believe that the core capacity needed for accessing the field of the future is presence. We first thought of presence as being fully conscious and aware in the present moment. Then we began to appreciate presence as deep listening, of being open beyond one’s preconceptions and historical ways of making sense. We came to see the importance of letting go of old identities and the need to control and, as Salk said, making choices to serve the evolution of life. Ultimately, we came to see all these aspects of presence as leading to a state of “letting come,”of consciously participating in a larger field for change. When this happens, the field shifts, and the forces shaping a situation can shift from re-creating the past to manifesting or realizing an emerging future.” Peter Senge.U process Caspari

Download this paper here: TransformationShift [Paper039]